[Topcools editor ’ s kommentere: Denne WSJ artikkelen er bekrefter vanligere føre til mer samtykke i samvittighetsfulle og sub-bevisst nivå, dermed mindre tvist og misliker. Felles kultur, lignende familie, lignende tenkning, verdi, hobbyer, bakgrunn, interesse, vaner, toleransenivå kan betydelig redusere din 50% sjanse for å mislykkes. Personer fra samme provinsen, lignende familie har fordel fordi samtykke i bevisst nivå kan være forfalsket på grunn av sex attraktivitet eller undertrykt skyldes ubalansert mann/kvinne-forhold]

Fra Wall Street Journal: August. 21, 2014 11:46 am. ET —————————————
Mer underbevisste negativiteten i en nygifte, Jo større nedgangen i ekteskapelig tilfredshet fire år senere

Mange ting der ute har en 50% sjanse av – en mynt kaste kommer opp hoder, selvfølgelig; å ha en felles bursdag blant 25 folk på en fest; født med svømmehud tær hvis en foreldre og besteforeldre har dem; tom for penger ved 30 år etter avgang med en typisk finansiell portefølje; og, Ifølge mange studier de siste tiår, å ha en ekteskap slutt i skilsmisse.

Den siste kontroll, sammen med forekomsten av ekteskap som forblir intakt men grunnlegger, er en doozy. Så det isn ’ t overraskende at masse vitenskap og pseudovitenskap har gått til identifisere prediktorer for vellykket ekteskap.

Forskere har brukt hjernen skanner for å kikke inn folk ’ s leder mens de tenker på deres ektefeller. Andre be par til å diskutere en av deres forhold ’ s vanskelige spørsmål og samle inn data om kroppsspråk under det påfølgende argumentet. And then there are the Harvard mathematicians who report an enormous likelihood that a marriage will succeed if a couple gives the same answers to just three questions: “Do you like horror movies?” “Have you ever traveled around another country alone?” og “Wouldn’t it be fun to chuck it all and go live on a sailboat?”

An excellent 2013 paper in the journal Science adds important insights to the matter.

The research, led by James McNulty of Florida State University, involved members of 135 assosiatiewe priming taak.. The scientists intermittently collected similar data from them over the next four years.

First off, they found that ratings of marital satisfaction declined over time, something reported previously. They also learned that the answers from newlyweds predicted nothing about marital satisfaction four years later.

But the scientists also measured something else in those newlyweds, using an “associative priming task.”

This involves briefly flashing a series of words like “wonderful” eller “odious” on a screen; subjects have to quickly press one of two buttons, depending on whether the word has positive or negative connotations.

Now comes the subconscious manipulation.

Just before each word, the researchers flashed up a picture of a random face for an instant—300 milliseconds—too fast for people to be consciously certain about what they saw but enough time for our subconscious, emotional brain circuitry to be certain. If the face evokes positive feelings, the brain immediately takes on something akin to a positive mind-set; if the word flashed up an instant later is a positive one, the brain quickly detects it as such. But if the word is negative, there is an instant of subconscious dissonance—”I was feeling great, but now I have to think about that word that means ‘inconsiderate jerk who doesn’t replace the toilet paper.’ ” And it takes a few milliseconds longer to hit the “negative” key. Conversely, display faces with negative connotations, and there is that dissonance-induced minuscule delay in identifying positive terms.

So in the study, the rapid-fire sequence of faces/words included a picture of one’s new spouse, revealing automatic feelings about the person’s beloved. That led to the key finding: The more subconscious negativity in a newlywed, the larger the decline in marital satisfaction four years later.

Did subjects understand what the priming task was about? nei, and people’s automatic responses were unrelated to their answers on the questionnaire. Was that discrepancy due to an unwillingness to answer honestly, or were people unaware of their automatic attitudes? It is impossible to tell. Did people with the most positive automatic feelings about their spouses subsequently develop fewer problems in their marriages, or were they less sensitive to the usual number of problems? Subtle data analysis suggested the latter.

What does this study tell us, utover antyder at lovebirds bør sannsynligvis ta denne kjekk liten datastyrt testen før de giftet seg? Det minner oss, like mye lærer vi om hjernen og atferd, at vi er underlagt endeløse, intern biologiske styrker som vi er uvitende.

—————–
http://Online.WSJ.com/articles/New-Ways-to-predict-which-marriages-Will-Succeed-1408636006
—————–

Legge til favoritter