[Topcools editor’s comment: Artikel WSJ iki nyantosakaké timbal luwih umum kanggo liyane idin ing tingkat conscientious lan sub-conscientious, mangkono kurang regejegan lan resent. Budaya umum, kulawarga padha, pikiran padha, Nilai, hobby, latar mburi, kapentingan, Sifat, tingkat toleransi bisa Ngartekno Cut Panjenengan 50% kasempatan Gagal. Wong saka propinsi ingkang sami, kulawarga padha nduweni kauntungan amarga idin ing tingkat conscientious bisa faked amarga attractiveness jinis utawa kasim amarga lanang / wadon aspek unbalanced]
Saka Wall Street Journal: Sep. 21, 2014 11:46 a.m. Lan —————————————
Ing liyane negativity Subconscious ing newlywed, ing Larger ing nolak ing Kepuasan Marital Four taun salajengipun
Persil saka iku metu ana sing teka karo 50% chance of occurring—a coin toss coming up heads, mesthi; gadhah siji ulang sambungan antarane 25 wong ing partai; kang lair karo driji sikil webbed yen tiyang sepah lan grandparent duwe wong; mlaku metu saka dhuwit dening 30 taun sawise leren karo portofolio financial khas; lan, miturut akeh pasinaon liwat dekade anyar, gadhah pungkasan marriage ing divorce.
Sing factoid pungkasan, bebarengan karo kedadean sing ora dikarepke saka kekawin sing tetep utuh nanging pangadeg, punika doozy a. So it isn’t surprising that lots of science and pseudoscience has gone into identifying predictors of successful marriages.
Scientists have used brain scanners to peek inside people’s heads while they think about their spouses. Others ask couples to discuss one of their relationship’s contentious issues and collect data about body language during the ensuing argument. Banjur ana matématikawan Harvard sing laporan lan tentrem gedhe tenan sing ningkahan bakal kasil yen saperangan menehi jawaban padha mung telung pitakonan: “Aja seneng medeni film?” “Apa kowe tau kesah ing saindhenging negara liyane piyambak?” lan “Wouldn’t it be fun to chuck it all and go live on a sailboat?”
Banget 2013 kertas ing Jurnal Ilmu nambah pemahaman penting kanggo prakara.
Riset, dipimpin déning James McNulty Florida State University, anggota melu saka 135 pasangan newlywed sing semaur survey standar bab kualitas kekawin sing. Ilmuwan intermittently diklumpukake data padha saka wong liwat patang taun sabanjuré.
Pisanan mati, padha ketemu sing ratings kepuasan kakawinan nolak liwat wektu, soko sing dilapurake sadurunge. Padha uga sinau sing jawaban saka newlyweds mbadek apa-apa bab kepuasan kakawinan patang taun sawisé.
Nanging ilmuwan uga diukur mergo sing newlyweds, nggunakake “tugas progametangium associative.”
Iki melu sedhela sumunar seri kaya “apik” utawa “odious” ing layar; subjek kudu cepet pencet salah siji saka rong tombol, gumantung apa tembung nduweni connotations positif utawa negatif.
Saiki rawuh penipuan subconscious.
Sadurungé saben tembung, the researchers flashed up a picture of a random face for an instant—300 milliseconds—too fast for people to be consciously certain about what they saw but enough time for our subconscious, circuitry otak emosi dadi tartamtu. Yen pasuryan evokes raos positif, otak langsung njupuk soko akin kanggo positif pikiran-pesawat; yen tembung flashed munggah cepet mengko iku siji positif, otak cepet ndeteksi iku kayata. Nanging yen tembung negatif, there is an instant of subconscious dissonance—”Aku kroso gedhe, but now I have to think about that word that means ‘inconsiderate jerk who doesn’t replace the toilet paper.’ ” Lan njupuk sawetara milliseconds maneh kanggo mencet “negatif” tombol. Kosok baline, tampilan lika karo connotations negatif, lan ana sing wektu tundha dissonance-mlebu minuscule ing Ngenali positif istilah.
Dadi ing sinau, the rapid-fire sequence of faces/words included a picture of one’s new spouse, revealing automatic feelings about the person’s beloved. Sing mimpin kanggo nemokake tombol: Ing negativity liyane subconscious ing newlywed a, Kurangé populasi luwih gedhe ing kepuasan kakawinan patang taun sawisé.
Apa subjek ngerti apa tugas progametangium ana bab? Ora, and people’s automatic responses were unrelated to their answers on the questionnaire. Ana bedho amarga menyang unwillingness kanggo njawab sajujure, utawa wong ora peduli saka Donyane otomatis sing? Iku mokal kanggo ngomong. Apa wong raos otomatis paling positif bab pasangan bojo salajengipun berkembang kurang masalah ing kekawin sing, utawa padha kurang sensitif nomer biasanipun saka masalah? Analisis data subtle disaranake terakhir.
Apa ora sinau iki marang kita, ngluwihi sing nyaranke lovebirds mbokmenawa ngirim njupuk test komputerisasi iki apik sadurunge marrying? Iku ngelingaken kita, kaya akeh kita sinau bab otak lan prilaku, sing kita sing tundhuk telas, pasukan biologi internal kang kita ora peduli.
—————–
http://online.wsj.com/articles/new-ways-to-predict-which-marriages-will-succeed-1408636006
—————–
Tambah favorites
