[Topcools editor’s comment: Artikel WSJ ieu confirming lead leuwih ilahar leuwih idin di tingkat conscientious jeung sub-conscientious, sahingga kurang sengketa jeung ambek. budaya umum, kulawarga sarua, pamikiran sarupa, ajen, hobi, kasang tukang, bunga, kabiasaan, tingkat kasabaran bisa nyata neukteuk Anjeun 50% kasempetan gagal. Jalma ti propinsi sarua, kulawarga sarua ngabogaan kaunggulan sabab idin di tingkat conscientious bisa faked alatan daya tarik sex atawa diteken alatan henteu saimbang jalu / rasio bikangna]
Ti Wall Street Journal: Aug. 21, 2014 11:46 a.m. AND —————————————
Nu More Subconscious Negativity dina Newlywed, nu leuwih badag turunna di Warudoyong kakawinan Opat Taun Engké
Kavling hal kaluar aya datang jeung 50% chance of occurring—a coin toss coming up heads, tangtosna; ngabogaan hiji ulang Tanjungjaya antara 25 jalma di hiji partéy; keur lahir jeung toes webbed lamun indung jeung Embah boga aranjeunna; ngajalankeun kaluar duit ku 30 taun sanggeus pangsiun jeung portopolio finansial has; jeung, nurutkeun loba studi leuwih dekade anyar, gaduh ahir nikah di cerai.
Nu factoid pamungkas, babarengan jeung incidence tina pertikahan nu tinggal gembleng tapi pangadeg, nyaéta doozy a. So it isn’t surprising that lots of science and pseudoscience has gone into identifying predictors of successful marriages.
Scientists have used brain scanners to peek inside people’s heads while they think about their spouses. Others ask couples to discuss one of their relationship’s contentious issues and collect data about body language during the ensuing argument. Terus aya nu matematikawan Harvard anu ngalaporkeun hiji likelihood pisan nu nikah bakal sukses lamun pasangan méré jawaban sarua kakara tilu patarosan: “Ulah anjeun resep film horor?” “Dupi anjeun kantos ngumbara di sakuliah nagara sejen sorangan?” jeung “Wouldn’t it be fun to chuck it all and go live on a sailboat?”
hiji alus teuing 2013 kertas di jurnal Science nambihan wawasan penting pikeun zat.
panalungtikan, dipingpin ku James McNulty tina Florida State University, aub anggota 135 pasangan newlywed anu dijawab a survey standar ngeunaan kualitas pertikahan maranéhanana. Nu élmuwan intermittently dikumpulkeun data sarua ti eta leuwih opat taun saterusna.
Bagéa, maranehna manggihan yén ratings tina kapuasan kakawinan ditolak kana waktu, hal dilaporkeun saméméhna. Maranéhanana ogé diajar yen waleran ti newlyweds diprediksi euweuh ngeunaan kapuasan kakawinan opat taun saterusna.
Tapi élmuwan ogé diukur hal sejenna di maranéhanana newlyweds, maké “priming tugas associative.”
Ieu ngalibatkeun sakeudeung kedip-kedip runtuyan kecap kawas “alus pisan” atawa “odious” dina layar a; subjék kudu gancang pencét salah sahiji dua tombol, gumantung kana naha kecap ngabogaan konotatif positif atawa négatif.
Ayeuna asalna manipulasi subconscious.
Ngan saméméh unggal kecap, the researchers flashed up a picture of a random face for an instant—300 milliseconds—too fast for people to be consciously certain about what they saw but enough time for our subconscious, emosi circuitry uteuk jadi tangtu. Lamun beungeut evokes parasaan positif, uteuk geura dicokot hal Akın ka pikiran-set positif; lamun kecap flashed up an instan saterusna nyaéta hiji positif, uteuk gancang ngadeteksi jadi saperti. Tapi lamun kecap négatif, there is an instant of subconscious dissonance—”Kuring ngarasa gede, but now I have to think about that word that means ‘inconsiderate jerk who doesn’t replace the toilet paper.’ ” Jeung eta nyokot sababaraha milliseconds deui ka pencét “negatip” konci. Sabalikna, pintonan nyanghareup jeung konotatif negatif, jeung aya nu reureuh minuscule dissonance-ngainduksi dina identifying watesan positif.
Jadi dina pangajaran, the rapid-fire sequence of faces/words included a picture of one’s new spouse, revealing automatic feelings about the person’s beloved. Nu ngarah ka Pananjung konci: Beuki subconscious negativity di newlywed a, nu leuwih gede turunna di kapuasan kakawinan opat taun saterusna.
Naha mata pelajaran ngarti naon tugas priming ieu ngeunaan? teu, and people’s automatic responses were unrelated to their answers on the questionnaire. Ieu béda anu alatan hiji unwillingness ngajawab paruk, atawa éta jalma unaware tina sikap otomatis maranéhanana? Mustahil ngabejaan. Naha urang jeung parasaan otomatis paling positif ngeunaan spouses maranéhanana salajengna ngamekarkeun masalah pangsaeutikna dina pertikahan maranéhanana, atawa éta maranéhanana kurang peka jumlah biasa masalah? analisis data halus ngusulkeun kiwari dimungkinkeun.
Naon teu ulikan ieu ngabejaan urang, leuwih suggesting nu lovebirds meureun kudu nyokot test komputerisasi nifty ieu samemeh nikah? Eta reminds urang, kawas loba urang diajar ngeunaan uteuk jeung paripolah, urang anu poko keur sajajalan, gaya biologis internal nu urang unaware.
—————–
http://online.wsj.com/articles/new-ways-to-predict-which-marriages-will-succeed-1408636006
—————–
Tambahkeun ka paporit
